Loop Table Tennis · Tournament results

Halloween Open

Results published
5
events
53
players in played matches
159
matches played

Find your results

Your matches, your finish, your Elo.

Your tournament

Yan Yan Fan

Back to all results
Played
5
Won
0
Lost
5
Tournament Elo
-21.6

Starting Elo 1,407to1,385 after your last match.

Your Elo journey

Cumulative Elo change from this tournament, not your overall club rating.

Tournament Elo change for Yan Yan FanStarts at zero and ends at -21.6 Elo across 5 played matches in published club order. Other club matches are excluded. Use the match selector below for exact values.+5-6-16-27BeforeAfter 5 matches

Band 1 · Bracket B · Final

vs Peter Hidas
This match
-4.7
Tournament so far
-21.6
Matches are spaced by published order, not elapsed time. Byes and unplayed fixtures are excluded. Tap the graph or use the slider; arrow keys, Home and End also work.
Full player profile
Match by match 7 fixtures
  1. Band 1 · Group 2 · Match 2vs Marek Grala
    Loss-5.7Elo
  2. Band 1 · Group 2 · Match 4vs Kola Adebayo Oseni
    Loss-3.1Elo
  3. Band 1 · Group 2 · Match 6vs Eric Trubilowicz
    Loss-7.4Elo
  4. Band 1 · Group 2 · Match 8vs Armand Bratulescu
    Loss-0.7Elo
  5. Band 1 · Bracket B · Finalvs Peter Hidas
    Loss-4.7Elo
  6. Band 1 · Bracket B · Quarter-finalBye
    Bye
  7. Band 1 · Bracket B · Semi-finalBye
    Bye

Wins and progression follow the tournament record. Elo uses published club results. Byes and unplayed fixtures are not counted in your win rate (0%).

Round robin

Band 2.5

13 matches played

The numbers behind the day

Band 2.5 highlights

Wins, rating gains and the results that went against the odds. Just this event.

Biggest Elo gains

Published changes earned here, not current club ratings. Complete rating coverage only.

  1. Colin Ma4 matches+56.6Elo
  2. Michal Zacharek5 matches+52.6Elo
  3. Joseph Dhivakar Stanslaus5 matches+36.6Elo

Most wins

Every played match counts. Byes and matches not played do not.

  1. Michal Zacharek4 wins from 5 matches80%win rate
  2. Colin Ma4 wins from 4 matches100%win rate
  3. Joseph Dhivakar Stanslaus3 wins from 5 matches60%win rate
  4. Christopher Kearney2 wins from 5 matches40%win rate
  5. Ronald Fernandes0 wins from 3 matches0%win rate
  6. Tian Rui Jin0 wins from 4 matches0%win rate

Against the odds

Wins with the lowest Elo-based expected chance before the match. An estimate, not a prediction of effort or talent.

  1. Joseph Dhivakar Stanslausbeat Christopher KearneyBand 2.5 · 200 Elo gap24%expected win
  2. Michal Zacharekbeat Christopher KearneyBand 2.5 · 66 Elo gap40.6%expected win
  3. Joseph Dhivakar Stanslausbeat Tian Rui JinBand 2.5 · 62 Elo gap41.2%expected win
  4. Joseph Dhivakar Stanslausbeat Ronald FernandesBand 2.5 · 59 Elo gap41.6%expected win
  5. Michal Zacharekbeat Ronald FernandesBand 2.5 · 49 Elo gap43%expected win
  6. Colin Mabeat Christopher KearneyBand 2.5 · 48 Elo gap43.1%expected win
  7. Michal Zacharekbeat Tian Rui JinBand 2.5 · 14 Elo gap48%expected win

Strongest opponents beaten

Opponent strength at the time of the match, using published ratings.

  1. Joseph Dhivakar Stanslausbeat Christopher KearneyBand 2.51,674opponent Elo
  2. Colin Mabeat Christopher KearneyBand 2.51,663opponent Elo
  3. Michal Zacharekbeat Christopher KearneyBand 2.51,644opponent Elo
  4. Michal Zacharekbeat Ronald FernandesBand 2.51,593opponent Elo
  5. Christopher Kearneybeat Tian Rui JinBand 2.51,589opponent Elo
  6. Colin Mabeat Michal ZacharekBand 2.51,580opponent Elo
  7. Michal Zacharekbeat Tian Rui JinBand 2.51,577opponent Elo
  8. Christopher Kearneybeat Ronald FernandesBand 2.51,575opponent Elo

The draw keeps the official tournament record. Rating highlights use verified published club results; a corrected outcome that differs from the draw is not presented as a tournament upset. Match order affects Elo. Game and point statistics are only available where those scores were recorded.

Official tournament record · Public club ratings revision 25

Historical groups and bracket paths are preserved. Later corrections to club results are identified where they differ.

View club rankings ↗